12 angry men juror 3 essays

There are two main characteristics of the 10th juror that influence his verdict. The second is that he is uncaring and impatient. The first time we get a glimpse of juror 10 s prejudice is on page 7 when he says It s the element. I m telling you they let those kids run wild up there.

Analysis of Juror #3 in Twelve Anrgy Men

The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. One juror is not happy about this stay of execution and is holding fast his opinion of guilty.

Juror three, the president of his business, refuses to alter his vote or opinion in any way. Still haunted by his own son, juror three verbally assaults the group with a forceful tone and a taciturn attitude.

One of twelve, Reginald Rose created them all from the same pen and ink, and they could all be no more different. Juror three is angry, bitter man who has spent his entire life forcing his opinions unto others, and has most likely succeeded in this endeavor. As the play wears on and his reliable witnesses were called into question, and more speculation was put upon the table, he begins to become more forceful in his arguments, raising his voice much more often than usual.

He firmly believes in the guilt of the accused, no matter what the other jurors say or do. There are other things influencing his opinion other than stubbornness however. Juror three has a son. The accused however did not just beat back at his father. The accused supposedly murdered him. But it does not stop there. Throughout the play, juror three interrupts others in mid-sentence and attacks their opinions hoping to quash them quickly before they pollute his own flawless opinion and doubt has a chance to creep into the dark crevices of his mind.

For instance, when juror eight surprises the group with a second knife, juror three is already angry, too angry. His voice rises and shakes with an animal-like ferocity. Now supposing you tell us what you proved here. Maybe there are ten knives like that one. So what? With a very short temper to go along with his all-powerful attitude, juror three is not a nice person.

Already he has threatened death towards one of the other jurors and would have made good the threat had it not been for the decisive actions of the other jurors who jumped up to hold him back.. An acrimonious and blind-sighted executioner, juror 3 is one of many that an innocent victim would not want to decide their fate. Unfortunately, democracy does not only apply to the fair and just, and undoubtedly innocent men and women have fallen prey to the unwavering wrath of men and women just like juror three who are too subjective to see the truth.

All is not lost however. There may be millions out there like juror three, but there are still people out there with good intentions and clarity of mind that can see through the narrow rage of the juror threes of the world.

Everyday, a man goes on trial, sometimes for his life. His judgement should come from the clear mind and not the clouded heart. Human , the most superior and the highest value of the world. Its a creature who has already known its…. America the beautiful,Who are you beautiful for?

America, the land of opportunity, but is it really? America is made up of…. Some have declared majors and others go…. I'm Jack. Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one? Skip to content 12 Angry Men Essay Juror 3 In a crowded jury room in downtown New York, opinions collide as discussion about the innocence of a young boy is decided.

Marbury Vs Madison. Check it out.

Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting play about an unfortunate young man, who was convicted of killing his dad. The three jurors I picked are juror #10, juror #. Even Juror 3 has a couple of prejudices remarks, however his remarks where shallow, there was more under his angry facade there was a pain.

In a crowded jury room in downtown New York, opinions collide as discussion about the innocence of a young boy is decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. One juror is not happy about this stay of execution and is holding fast his opinion of guilty.

Login Join.

Login Register. Search the forums now!

The Twelve Angry Men Juror 3 and Juror 8 Comparing Essay

Holly K. Peralta, Credentialed English Teacher. Teaching Students the Art of Language. Reginald Rose's play offers many characters from which students can choose to analyze. One of the skills we want our students to walk away with is the ability to collaborate with others, even when others are difficult to work with. We also want them to be aware of their own personal biases and to be able to judicially control them, especially when the fate of another is on the line.

Twelve Angry Men Essay | Essay

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you. Perhaps the most important element is the relationship between Juror 3 and Juror 8, as the constant conflict between these two drives the narrative of the drama, allowing other significant elements to develop and be explored. However, the conflict between Juror 3 and 8 also stimulates discussion on the reliability of the evidence presented. This leads to the next important element — reasonable doubt — being acknowledged as a possibility by the Jurors. Without the conflict between Jurors 3 and 8 none of the other elements would have developed, therefore resulting in the certain execution of a potentially innocent youth. From the beginning of the play the audience can see the jury room is split into warring blocks between those who vouch for a guilty verdict and those who vouch a non-guilty verdict. This is mainly due to the fact that the jury room is verdict driven; the discussion is shaped by the battles between the jurors defending their early verdict choices. What they do to you, how they kill you every day. Through the 8th Juror Rose highlights the power of the lone voice amongst most overwhelming majority.

Some are more likely to be pointed out as prejudice, and others are more focused on reaching fair justice. In all of the twelve jurors, I have chosen Juror 3 and Juror 8 for contrast and comparison.

Juror number three wasn't necessarily prejudice but was hateful and bitter when it came to kids. His history wasn't happy with his own child; and I think that's where he gets most of his anger towards children. Browse all BookRags Study Guides. All rights reserved.

Analysis of Underlying Themes in Twelve Angry Men

The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. One juror is not happy about this stay of execution and is holding fast his opinion of guilty. Juror three, the president of his business, refuses to alter his vote or opinion in any way. Still haunted by his own son, juror three verbally assaults the group with a forceful tone and a taciturn attitude. One of twelve, Reginald Rose created them all from the same pen and ink, and they could all be no more different. Juror three is angry, bitter man who has spent his entire life forcing his opinions unto others, and has most likely succeeded in this endeavor. As the play wears on and his reliable witnesses were called into question, and more speculation was put upon the table, he begins to become more forceful in his arguments, raising his voice much more often than usual. He firmly believes in the guilt of the accused, no matter what the other jurors say or do. There are other things influencing his opinion other than stubbornness however. Juror three has a son. The accused however did not just beat back at his father. The accused supposedly murdered him. But it does not stop there.

Twelve Angry Men - Juror 3

The film 12 Angry Men written by Reginald Rose depicts different human personalities attempting to decide the fate of a young man who is accused of killing his father. The jury must determine a verdict of not guilty or guilty, sending a young man to be executed for the crime of murder. However, eleven out of the twelve Jurors have it all figured out, Guilty they agree due to reasons that are illogical. Our writers will create an original "12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose" essay for you. However, Juror 8, the only Juror out of the twelve that took it upon himself to begin a discussion that would soon lead his fellow jury members to re-evaluate their positions by using personal prejudices, experience, evidence, swaying the Jurors to the moral decision. A kid kills his father. Just like that. They let the kids run wild. You know that. As the film continues, the more everyone began to realize how ignorant and cowardly Juror 10 truly is, believing if he keeps spouting his racist rants with aggression he will eventually get everyone to side with him.