1906 san francisco earthquake research paper
David J. Wald, Hiroo Kanamori, Donald V. Helmberger, Thomas H. Heaton; Source study of the San Francisco earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America ; 83 4 : — All quality teleseismic recordings of the great San Francisco earthquake archived in the Carnegie Report by the State Earthquake Investigation Commission were scanned and digitized.
Institute of European Studies
Skip to content. For additional information, check out our lists of links and references below. The earthquake was felt throughout California and Nevada. The following description is taken from the paper by Dr.
The California earthquake of April 18, , ranks as one of the most significant earthquakes of all time. Today, its importance comes more from the wealth of scientific knowledge derived from it than from its sheer size.
Rupturing the northernmost km of the San Andreas fault from northwest San Juan Bautista to the triple junction of Cape Mendocino, the earthquake confounded contemporary geologists with its large, horizontal displacements and great rupture length. Indeed the significance of the fault and recognition of its large cumulative offset would not be fully appreciated until the advent of plate tectonics more than half a century later.
Analysis of the displacements and strain in the surrounding crust led Reid to formulate his elastic-rebound theory of the earthquake source, which remains today the principal model of the earthquake cycle. As a basic reference about the earthquake and the damage it caused, geologic observations of the fault rupture and shaking effects, and other consequences of the earthquake, Lawson's report remains the authoritative work, as well as arguably the most important study of a single earthquake.
In the public's mind, this earthquake is perhaps remembered most for the fire it spawned in San Francisco, giving it the somewhat misleading appellation of the "San Francisco earthquake. The frequently quoted value of deaths caused by the earthquake and fire is now believed to underestimate the total loss of life by a factor of 3 or 4. Most of the fatalities occurred in San Francisco, and were reported elsewhere. Lawson, A. This is a comprehensive report on the earthquake, published by the State Earthquake Investigation Commission, and comprises two volumes and an atlas.
An excellent resource. Schultz, S. This "General Interest Publication" is a nice introduction to the San Andreas for a general audience.
Wald, D. Wallace, R. A collection of review articles on the San Andreas Fault, covering the evolution, physiography, seismicity, and deformation along the fault.
Excellent reference. More recent research indicates that estimates in the range from 7. The motion was predominately right-lateral strike-slip, with a peak displacement of 6 meters near Olema. Outreach Home. California Faults. Be Prepared. Historical Earthquakes.
AM - April 18, San Francisco City Hall after the Earthquake. (from Steinbrugge Collection of the UC Berkeley Earthquake Engineering Research. The San Francisco earthquake occured on April 18, at AM local More recent research indicates that estimates in the range from to are paper by Dr. William Ellsworth in USGS Professional Paper - "The San.
San Francisco City Hall after the Earthquake. The California earthquake of April 18, ranks as one of the most significant earthquakes of all time. Today, its importance comes more from the wealth of scientific knowledge derived from it than from its sheer size.
Devastating fires soon broke out in the city and lasted for several days.
Skip to content. For additional information, check out our lists of links and references below.
1906 Earthquake
On the morning of April 18, , a massive earthquake shook San Francisco, California. Though the quake lasted less than a minute, its immediate impact was disastrous. The earthquake also ignited several fires around the city that burned for three days and destroyed nearly city blocks. Despite a quick response from San Francisco's large military population, the city was devastated. The earthquake and fires killed an estimated 3, people and left half of the city's , residents homeless.
San Francisco earthquake of 1906
The San Francisco earthquake of remains one of the biggest urban disasters in American history. This paper gives a comprehensive overview of how the city coped with the immediate consequences of the catastrophe and quickly rebuilt. It analyzes the tense political situation of San Francisco in , the role of the economic elite during and after the disaster, insurance aspects, social consequences of the process of rebuilding, and, finally, the treatment of the earthquake in the media and by contemporary geologists. I argue that the rebound of San Francisco was contingent on a unique combination of factors that ensured its success. However, San Francisco has limited value as a role model for other cities in a disaster situation. The downplay of the geological danger in the interest of economic benefits stood in the way of an adequate preparation for future earthquakes and hampered attempts to educate the general public. Skip to main content. UC Berkeley. Email Facebook Twitter. Abstract The San Francisco earthquake of remains one of the biggest urban disasters in American history.
San Francisco earthquake of , major earthquake with a magnitude of 7. The San Andreas Fault slipped along a segment about miles km long, extending from San Juan Bautista in San Benito county to Humboldt county and from there perhaps out under the sea to an unknown distance.
One of the greatest earthquakes happened in 20th century is in San Francisco in year It measured 7. Many building were destructed and several hundred of people got killed.
