12 angry men character analysis essay
Year anile boy is an analysis of a way, quiz questions, characters, literature essays, characters, women to 12 angry men lessons. Godfather death. Statistics on writing and free essays tagged college. Buy essay the following paper will discuss how does 12 angry men essay analysis, literature essays for an angry men? Such may 27,.
Twelve Angry Men Character Analysis
The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father.
A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair. The judge informs the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilty.
Ace your next assignment with help from a professional writer. Free proofreading and copy-editing included. Even before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty. The rest of the jury resents the inconvenience of his decision. After questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror 8 Henry Fonda by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour.
Eventually, as the talks proceed juror 8 slowly undermines their confidence by saying that the murder weapon is widely available to anyone, and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect. Gradually they are won over by his arguments and even the most narrow minded of his fellow jurors hesitantly agrees with him.
Their verdict is now a solid not guilty. Arriving at an unanimous not guilty verdict does not come easily. The jury encounters many difficulties in learning to communicate and deal with each other. Although the movie deals with issues relating to the process of effective communication this paper will focus of two reasons why they encounter difficulties and how they overcome them. First, we will apply the Johari grid theory and see how it applies to their situation.
If we analyze the Johari grid of each juror we see a large hidden area in the case of all of the men. Take into consideration, each man is referred to by a juror number, they do not even have the benefit of knowing each others names.
These men have never talked before. Each of them come from different situations with individual and unique experiences. The public area consists solely of the shared information provided during the trial. Their hidden area is immense, resulting in an equally large blind area. The public, hidden and blind areas are relatively the same for each juror before beginning the deliberation.
It is the size of the unconscious area that will differ more among the men. We will see how the contents of the unconscious area will largely affect the decision making process of some of the jurors. The information contained in the unconscious area is unrecognized, it is often the most difficult to overcome. He levels with the others by openly admitting that he does not know if the boy killed his father and solicits feedback in order to make an accurate decision.
The movie illustrates the process of leveling and soliciting feedback which can make all the difference. The character with the largest hidden window is the boy on trial. One man in particular, Juror 3 Lee J. Cobb has a sizable unconscious area. He has a troubled relationship with his own son that preoccupies his thoughts. This is alluded to in a conversation between juror 7 Jack Warden and himself. The broken relationship with his son preoccupies his thoughts at several times throughout the movie; he is found staring at the picture.
His interpersonal style would be classified as a blabbermouth. He is neither open or receptive. He has his opinion and loves to share it. The net result is a large blind area. He is unwilling or unable to level with the others and is also unreceptive to any feedback. Most likely the extent of these feelings and the effect it has on his perceptions is unconscious to him.
Eventually, he finds himself the only one maintaining a vote of guilty. He feels his sense of reality is in question and it threatens him. This puts him on the defensive. He bursts, accusing the others of being crazy. His defenses start to crumble as his unconscious emotions become visible to him.
By recognizing his unconscious emotions, essentially what he has done is level with himself. Once he did this he realized the anger and frustration with regards to his son has been misdirected toward the accused. With a new understanding of himself he is able to change his vote to not guilty. Another issue dealt with in the movie is prejudice. Prejudice is defined as premature judgment or bias. In a trial situation Jurors are asked to only consider the evidence presented to them.
Individual biases are not expected to affect the decision making process. Unfortunately, leaving our prejudices outside the court room door is near impossible. As the movie demonstrates prejudice can distort our views and greatly affects our ability to make accurate assessments. By nature! You know what I mean? While most of the men are aware of the stigma attached to people from the ghetto they are willing to try to put the stereotype aside. His outburst has caused quite a disturbance in the room.
This disturbance serves two purposes. It is always easier to overcome an objection if you know what it is. Having this knowledge allows for a more productive communication, thereby convincing him that he should change his vote. Secondly, it allows him to vent his frustrations.
In doing so, he realizes the power of his emotions which forces him to step back and take a look at what he really feels. The look on his face shows he has a realization. For the first time he understands his prejudices have affected his perceptions.
This new understanding of himself enables him to think more clearly and objectively. Yet the boy, a product of the same community is an assumed liar. As the movie closes the not guilty verdict is handed down.
It is not known if the boy is guilty or innocent, that will forever remain in his hidden area. Henry Fonda Juror 8 entered the trial with an open mind, he managed to convince the others to do the same.
The movie illustrates that everything is not what it appears to be. Being aware of this is the first step to better understanding. Let us do your homework! Expert writers in all subject areas are available and will meet your assignment deadline. Tutor and Freelance Writer. Science Teacher and Lover of Essays. Article last reviewed: St. Juror 3 Jack Klugman responds to the negative comments by informing them that he too is from the ghetto.
Very well analysed and presented. It was a tremendous help in assisting my Yr 9 son on his school home assessment. Skip to content.
Can We Write Your Essay? Can We Help with Your Assignment? Most reacted comment. Hottest comment thread. Recent comment authors. Michelle W. Richie J. It only takes seconds! Upload your Homework.
Characters In 12 Angry Men. Words | 4 Pages. In the movie Twelve Angry Men, Henry Fonda plays a character known as jury member number eight. All the jurors presume that the defendant is guilty except for one, the 8th Juror. Not reaching a unanimous vote means they must discuss the trial.
Twelve Angry Men. Plot Summary. Act 1 Act 2 Act 3.
Holly K. Peralta, Credentialed English Teacher.
The judge explains the obligations of the jurors, and after given the instruction, the jurors shall discuss thoroughly among themselves. They must return with a vote either guilty or not.
12 Angry Men Character List
Where this drama may lack in any attention to the setting, it makes up for it with its elaborately corroborated characters who are jurors making a decision on whether or not to charge a boy with murder hereafter sentencing him to the chair. As shown through the play, most of the jurors appear dissatisfied with the situation, a common nuisance with the public, having to work jury duty. However, one juror. Critical Appraisal In my opinion, 12 Angry Men is an awesome movie which keeps the audience captured in its essence. The entire cast has done an amazing work which is in fact the reason for the tremendous success of this movie.
Green Man & French Horn – Essays
The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair. The judge informs the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilty. Ace your next assignment with help from a professional writer. Free proofreading and copy-editing included. Even before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty. The rest of the jury resents the inconvenience of his decision. After questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror 8 Henry Fonda by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour. Eventually, as the talks proceed juror 8 slowly undermines their confidence by saying that the murder weapon is widely available to anyone, and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect.
Satan is. A negotiator needs to take note of the common types of behaviors that people exhibit during negotiations when determining how the negotiation will unfold.
The Foreman is responsible for keeping the jury organized, which is his main focus in the play. He is an assistant football coach outside of the jury room. He proudly says that he started his business from scratch and now employs thirty-four workers. We learn early on that he has a bad relationship with his own son, with whom he is no longer speaking.
Twelve Angry Men: Summary & Analysis
Twelve Angry Men is a play that has been written down and put into a book format, for the enjoyment of a wider audience. People with poor self-images are often quick to judge, demean, belittle, and rebuke others for their mistakes, shortcomings and flaws, simply out of spite or to protect their own reputation. This is true even in the MGM film Twelve Angry Men, where eleven of the twelve jurors attempt to convict a young man not based off of sound evidence, but off of personal prejudice and self-righteousness alone. It was the leadership of the eighth juror, however, that convinced the other jurors to set aside. Twelve Angry Men does quite a fantastic job of setting up a hypothetical situation in which the audience is exposed to quite a well developed plot that entails an interesting metamorphosis of character between the twelve jurors. At first glance, it would be easy to want to condemn most of the men as immoral, however taking into account Hursthouse's three core ideas of virtuosity many of the men exhibit these traits once critical thinking finally takes hold over their judgment. All three core ideas. The tense, gripping storyline that takes place in the s features a group of jurors who must decide unanimously whether a young man is guilty or innocent in the murder of his father. At the beginning, eleven of the twelve jurors voted guilty. Gradually, through some heated discussion, the jurors are swayed to a not-guilty. Fonda, G.
12 angry men analysis essay
Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, this trial film tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt, forcing the jurors to question their morals and values. In the United States, a verdict in most criminal trials by jury must be unanimous. The film is notable. Sidney Lumet and Reginald Rose the writers and directors of 12 Angry Men wrote and produced a play about 12 jurors that briefly discuss a trial and come to a verdict , personal issues develop which causes conflict and only makes the process more grueling. The accused boy is being found guilty for murdering his father, 12 jurors are put in a hot room in New York. In the movie Twelve Angry Men, Henry Fonda plays a character known as jury member number eight, otherwise also known as Mr. Though this statement may be true, the movie also involves eleven other characters who have huge contributions to the story line. Throughout the movie, the audience watches twelve jury members discuss the alleged murder trial for an eighteen year old. In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership.
