12 angry men juror 9 essay
He lived in a peaceful neighborhood, where there was not much violence, and that is where he gets his calming nature from. Although, he has not had much recognition growing up and does not have many friends. Henry Johnson started off the jury as an old man who is eager to have a say in the trial. He was quiet in the beginning, but played a key role in determining that the old man's testimony was innaccurate. He is respectful of other juror's decisions and was the first juror to change his vote and join alongside Juror 8. Would you like me to tell you why?
Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose Essay
He lived in a peaceful neighborhood, where there was not much violence, and that is where he gets his calming nature from. Although, he has not had much recognition growing up and does not have many friends.
Henry Johnson started off the jury as an old man who is eager to have a say in the trial. He was quiet in the beginning, but played a key role in determining that the old man's testimony was innaccurate. He is respectful of other juror's decisions and was the first juror to change his vote and join alongside Juror 8. Would you like me to tell you why?
Nobody knows him, nobody quotes him, nobody seeks his advice after seventy-five years. That's a very sad thing, to be nothing. A man like this needs to be recognized, to be listened to, to be quoted just once. At first, I didn't want to get involved too much in the decision of the jury and just vote with the rest of the jurors.
After the vote, I saw that Juror 8 actually voted "not guilty". The other jurors were coming down hard on him, as to why he could vote "not guilty" in what seemed to be such an obvious decision.
Juror 8 said, "Its not easy to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first. At the second vote, I decided to change my vote to "not guilty" because I feel there is enough reasonable doubt. It took a lot of strength for me to change my vote, but I felt that Juror 8 should not stand there and be the only one on the opposing side.
As other's started convincing us of the old man's testimony and how he heard the kid yell, "I'm going to kill you" while an el-train was passing by. After hearing the old man's testimony in court, I couldn't help but compare him to my entire life. He was a very old man who carried two canes as he said his testimony in court.
I say that you cannot think the old man's testimony is accurate because he seems to be a quiet, frightened, insignificant man who has been nothing all his life - who has never had recognition - his name in the newspapers.
Nobody knows him after seventy-five years. This is a very sad thing. A man like this needs to be recognized - to be questioned, and listened to, and quoted just once. As we went on, after seeing Juror 4 rub his nose which is being irritated by his glasses , I realize that, like Juror 4, the woman who testified that she allegedly saw the murder had impressions in the sides of her nose which she rubbed, indicating that she wore glasses, but did not wear them to court out of vanity.
Juror 8 then asks 4 if he wears his eyeglasses to sleep, 4 replies that he doesn't and that nobody does. What this means is that the woman could not have been wearing glasses while trying to sleep, and she could not have had enough time to put them on because the attack happened extremely quickly.
From hearing this, Jurors 4, 10, and 12 all change their votes to "not guilty". As the jury went on, more people started to change their votes to "not guilty" after realizing that the testimony's of the old man and the women in court may not be accurate at all. At the end, everyone changed their vote and we all agreed that the boy was not guilty. Juror 9 may be a soft-spoken old man, but played a key role in the cause of changing votes. He was the first juror to respect Juror 8's independance of thought because he was convinced that there was not enough evidence to sentence the accused boy to death for allegedly murdering his father.
I feel like the other jurors did not take him seriously enough mainly because he was the oldest out of them all. In the beginning of the play, most readers would probably think that the old man was irrelevant because he was initially very quiet at the start of the jury decision but later on he becomes a dynamic part of the twelve. Bradford, Wade. Blogspot, 11 Sept. Turner Classic Movies, n. Login to rate this Glog. Login to comment on this Glog. Quotes Henry Johnson started off the jury as an old man who is eager to have a say in the trial.
Citations Bradford, Wade. Rate It! Tags Comments Login to comment on this Glog. There are no comments for this Glog. Follow us Twitter Pinterest Facebook.
Buzz Blog Press Contests. Join us Teacher Student Pricing.
Old Man Act I, Page , Column 1: As the Jurors are getting seated, the foreman asks if everyone is here. Twelve replies, “The old man's inside.” Then, the. However, the jurors of the lower class background speak of the boy without consciously referring to his class status. Juror 9 acts as the voice of reason in this case.
Juror 9 : Gentlemen, that's a very sad thing Juror 3 : He said 20 seconds. Juror 3 : He said twenty seconds! What are you tryin' to distort
Instead, the popular play was adapted from the author's live teleplay that debuted on CBS and was soon made into a movie.
As a member, you'll also get unlimited access to over 79, lessons in math, English, science, history, and more. Plus, get practice tests, quizzes, and personalized coaching to help you succeed. Already registered?
12 Angry Men Character Analysis
First off, the settings in the movie are a great deal more fleshed out. In the movie, the audience is placed in the role of the invisible casual observer, who for perhaps the first 5 minutes of the movie, walks throughout the court building passing other court rooms, lawyers, defendants, security officers, elevators, etc. Invisible and distant in the play, we see in the movie the judge, bailiff, those witnessing the trial and most importantly of all- the defendant. This is an important change because in the play, we are free to come up with our own unbiased conclusions as to the nature and identity of the defendant, whom we only know to a be a 19 year boy from the slums. Seeing his haggard and worn face in the movie changes all of that, yet for better or worse, it engages the audience deeper into the trial as they surely will sympathize with him and can gain some insight into why, later, Juror 8 does so as well.
In act 2, what does juror 9 suggest as the motive behind the old man witness testimont
Twelve Angry Men. Juror Nine. Juror Nine is an old man who wants justice. He plays a minor role in the story. Nine comes out, embarrassed. Combined, this shows Juror Nine is an old man. You know that. What a terrible thing for a man to believe!
Nine: to Ten very slowly. I don't know that.
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
12 Angry Men - Juror 9
With an abundance of audacious themes skillfully displayed throughout the feature length play, Rose has pushed the boundaries of the overly oppressive era from which the play was first published. The two main themes that were explored to great lengths throughout the play were prejudices and stereotypes. These themes were. It is very hard to not allow prejudice out of your mind, making decisions about others. It always seems that prejudice obscures the truth whatever you do. This best sums up the story of the play, Twelve Angry Men. Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, is about twelve caucasian jurors who are forced to make a verdict on whether a defendant of non-caucasian descent is guilty or not for premeditated homicide against his father. Unfortunately, the whole verdict seemed to depend on the thoughtful juror number. At this time, the United States was envolving into an internal struggle, the Civil Rights Movement, which was concerned with ending racism discrimination and promoting freedom, respect and equality. The viewers are told that an unidentified, young Hispanic male originating from the slums is on trial for supposedly stabbing his. Reginald Rose also reflects human nature. For hundreds of years, countries have developed constitutions and other documents in place to form justice for those within the country. These men have the unthinkable decisions of whether a suspected murderer is given the death penalty or able to walk free. The jury in Twelve Angry Men made the most just.
Juror 9 in 12 Angry Men: Character Analysis
JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. Just before the jurors retreat to their jury room, the judge reminds them that they have a very important responsibility to get past their versions of reality and to come up with the version that makes most sense. That's the whole point of having twelve jurors instead of one, since twelve jurors are more likely to come to a more objective version of reality. We heard the facts didn't we? You're not gonna tell me we're supposed to believe this kid, knowing what he is. We can tell early on that Juror 10 has a strong bias against the defendant because the defendant is non-white.
