18th century scotland essay
Discover in a free daily email today's famous history and birthdays Enjoy the Famous Daily. Search the whole site. Given the centuries of hostility between Scotland and England, with warfare even in the 17th century under a shared Stuart king, the union of the two kingdoms seems to come with surprising suddeness. It has been under discussion for a considerable time, for James VI and I tries to achieve it after inheriting the English throne in But the idea meets with little favour although imposed during the Commonwealth until the early 18th century. The motivation in is largely economic for the Scots and political for the English.
DISCLAIMER
Though the mid-eighteenth century is usually thought of as the century in which the first British empire reached its apogee and the late eighteenth century as the period when the second British empire took off, within the British Isles a much older process of imperial aggrandisement was ending. Between and , this objective was finally achieved. By the London-centred alliance of crown and Parliament held sway over the entire British Isles.
Prima facie this looks like the triumph of English imperialism, and there are elements of the new order that strongly suggest this remained a vital part of the process. In both Scotland and Ireland strong support for absorption by a 'British' polity developed across a broad constituency, and in both cases this constituency proved vital to the process. In Scotland the political impetus that carried the polity into union with England came from an old-fashioned dynastic crisis.
When her only surviving child, William, duke of Gloucester, died in it became clear the future Queen Anne was going to be the last of the Protestant Stuarts. In consequence, when the only Scottish Parliament of Anne's reign met in it quickly slipped out of ministerial control and in passed a raft of legislation designed by some to bolster Scotland's independence, and by others to force the English to seek a union of the two kingdoms. London's support took many forms. Some Scots politicians were forthrightly bribed, 'bought and sold for English gold', in the words of a famous song.
Most were not. Special deals for powerful constituencies such as the lawyers and Kirk, and promises of honours and jobs in the new polity tipped the balance. This was, however, only the beginning of the process of creating a British polity.
Many Scots were angry and unreconciled to the Union and the large pro-Jacobite minority proclaimed a Stuart restoration the only hope of ending it. Scotland only received any attention when it forced itself onto the Westminster radar by dint of vexed political disputes that intersected with politics in London, Jacobite rebellions and economic calamity. The problem of persuading the Scots that the Union was in their best interest was, too, compounded by deals made to help ease the Union's passage through the Scots Parliament.
These included the preservation of Scotland's separate Roman-Dutch centred legal system, which required separate legislation for Scotland and intermittantly clashed with its English counterpart, a Presbyterian Kirk that was suspicious of the Anglican hegemony built into the British Parliament and anomalous bodies like the Convention of Royal Burghs, which doggedly sought to advance its members' economic interests regardless of Westminster's policies.
Rather than address these problems, successive governments in London ignored them except in times of crisis, and then their interventions were not necessarily conducive to good order and government. When Scots law clashed with English law, as in over the issue of religious toleration for non-Presbyterian Protestants, the English majority in Parliament intervened to end the Kirk's Union-guaranteed right to persecute such dissidents.
The English majority was moved by the disingenuous presentation of the Scots Episcopal church as simply a law-abiding Scottish counterpart to the Church of England set upon by vicious Presbyterian fanatics, and however much this intervention might seem sympathetic to modern minds, it rested on profound ignorance of Scots socio-political dynamics. This partnership meant more to the Scots than the English, but it fostered a common sense of Britishness that helped consolidate the British polity in the hearts and minds of two key ethnicities within the British Isles.
They began in the same place: at the beginning of the eighteenth century the English generally regarded the Irish with the same contempt they viewed the Scots.
Ireland had its own Parliament and government, but both were ultimately controlled from London, in that all Irish legislation was subject to review and alteration by the English Privy Council, 26 and English administrations used government offices in Ireland as political patronage in England. Ireland's ruling elite had been reinstalled by English military force and was in consequence very aware of its dependence on English support.
Ireland's Parliament and government sought to defend, and where possible, advance, Ireland's economic interests. Protestant Irish officialdom also tended to value social peace and thus worked to fend off potential clashes between London's expectations and the sensibilities of the Catholic masses who farmed the Irish elite's estates, hewed their wood and drew their water.
The Irish elite thus acted as patrons and defenders of their people, and created an attenuated form of the social bonds that held society together throughout the rest of the archipelago. Though it was something they sought, this peace had repercussions for Ireland's rulers. In fits and starts from the s to the s this promoted the rise of a Protestant Patriot interest.
These began as regiments of patriotic civilians pledged to defend Ireland against the wicked Americans; they quickly became hothouses for Irish patriotism. Hence when it became clear by the most disastrous stage of the American war that the Volunteers and the Patriots could potentially become the nucleus of an American-style revolution, which Britain would have been hard pressed to put down, the North government glumly gave way and yielded a raft of economic concessions.
It was, though, too late for such douceurs to halt the Patriot movement, and its leaders notably Henry Grattan immediately began demanding Ireland's return to near full sovereignty and particularly the repeal of Poyning's Law, the basis of the British government's right to revise or veto Irish legislation. The triumph of the Protestant Ascendancy was, however, not to last.
The core problem in Ireland remained the total disfranchisement and day-to-day discrimination against its Catholic majority. Now Ireland was self-governing they wanted relief, and while there was substantial Protestant support for such reforms a short-sighted majority within the elite obstinately blocked almost every attempt to emancipate the Catholics. Alarmed and disgusted by the violent excesses of the French revolutionaries, Pitt and the majority of the British elite turned against reform.
This left the Irish Catholics and reformist Protestants notably strong among the Ulster Presbyterians frustrated and angry, and elements within this axis came together as a new organisation, the United Irishmen, which was drawn towards French Revolutionary principles.
This attacked Catholics believed to be threatening Protestant interests, provoking retaliation by the primarily Catholic secret society known as the Defenders. By the mids the cycle of outrage and retaliation between the two had put Ireland on the path to civil war. The United Irishmen had meanwhile been thoroughly radicalised by these events and their enthusiasm for the French Revolution, and in alliance with the Defenders were successfully negotiating for a French invasion of Ireland.
Despite being as hostile to the French Revolution and Defenderism as the Ascendancy, the hierarchy of the Catholic church and the surviving Catholic peerage and gentry, had lost all faith in the ability of Ascendancy government to maintain social order, and they looked to London for a solution.
They were joined in this by the shattered remnants of the Patriot coalition of the s, and this nexus, plus the disgust felt in London at the Ascendancy's incompetence, brought on a determination in London to force through a constitutional union.
Pitt therefore simply bought enough Ascendancy votes to pass it in , ironically only to be forced to leave office when George III obstructed the emancipation of Britain's Catholics that Pitt had promised would follow. Though the absorption of Scotland and Ireland by the pan-British state is sometimes regarded as both inevitable and good for all concerned, it is not clear this interpretation is well founded.
Despite its apparent poverty, it is possible that Scotland had the potential to make its own way; and it is instructive to note that in and the French, who were not sentimental about such things, thought a Scottish state allied to France could be economically and politically viable. Barring a sudden inclination to self-sacrifice on the part of the Protestant elite its contradictions were going to endure, and they eventually proved fatal. Yet this, too, was contingent. Britain defeated revolutionary France, but a French victory could have created a revitalised, democratically-inclined Irish state.
Ultimately perhaps the most important single factor in the creation of the British mega-state of was the determination of England's rulers to make it happen. That they decided to do so as opposed to keeping Scotland and Ireland as satellite states was entirely in response to contingent circumstances in and If Queen Anne had given birth to a fecund line of Protestant Stuarts, or Louis XVI successfully crushed the French Revolution, there would have been no need for drastic measures to secure England's interests and the Scots and Irish states might have survived a great deal longer.
Canny ed. Whatley with D. Devine and J. Sheils ed. Szechi and D. Jones ed. Ellis and S. Moody and W. Holmes and D.
Dickinson ed. Philpin ed. An Economic and Social History c. Gale, a Cengage Company, provides facsimile reproductions of original sources and do not endorse or dispute the content contained in them. Author affiliation and information within them are correct as of the original publication date. Further reproduction of this content is prohibited.
We use cookies to make our website easier for you to use, to display personalized content and ads , and to analyze our traffic.
Please see our Cookie Policy for more information on our use of cookies. Cookie Policy. Accept Cookies. Toggle Navigation. Looking for our book titles? Search Options Looking for our book titles?
Eighteenth-Century Scotland is the annual newsletter of ECSSS, published every 20 (), 10–12; Ian Simpson Ross, “'Two Essays on Self Deceit & Good. HISTORY OF SCOTLAND including Act of Union, Stuarts in exile, The There is unrest and warfare in Scotland during much of the 18th century because a strong His treatise is now published again in three more accessible parts (An Essay.
In order to set up a list of libraries that you have access to, you must first login or sign up. Then set up a personal list of libraries from your profile page by clicking on your user name at the top right of any screen. You also may like to try some of these bookshops , which may or may not sell this item. Separate different tags with a comma. To include a comma in your tag, surround the tag with double quotes.
North of this was Caledonia , inhabited by the Picti , whose uprisings forced Rome's legions back to Hadrian's Wall.
After the Union of , many landowners who perceived the need for improvement participated in the debates of the Enlightenment and carried out innovations on their estates. The more lavish aspects of country-house living had to be supported by fruitful activities, while the direct ties between the estate and the house allowed larger estates to finance bigger houses.
Scotland in the early modern period
It contains articles, announcements, and news about our members, as well as an annual bibliography of recent articles by members and a large section of book reviews. Contact the Executive Secretary rbsher6 gmail. Cole, Peter S. Caudell, eds. Radner, 18—20 Fiona Stafford and Howard Gaskill, eds.
18th century scotland essay
Scotland in the early modern period refers, for the purposes of this article, to Scotland between the death of James IV in and the end of the Jacobite risings in the mid-eighteenth century. It roughly corresponds to the early modern period in Europe , beginning with the Renaissance and Reformation and ending with the start of the Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution. After a long minority , the personal reign of James V saw the court become a centre of Renaissance patronage, but it ended in military defeat and another long minority for the infant Mary Queen of Scots. Scotland hovered between dominance by the English and French, which ended in the Treaty of Edinburgh , by which both withdrew their troops, but leaving the way open for religious reform. The Scottish Reformation was strongly influenced by Calvinism leading to widespread iconoclasm and the introduction of a Presbyterian system of organisation and discipline that would have a major impact on Scottish life. In Mary returned from France, but her personal reign deteriorated into murder, scandal and civil war, forcing her to escape to England where she was later executed and leaving her Protestant opponents in power in the name of the infant James VI. In he inherited the thrones of England and Ireland, creating a dynastic union and moving the centre of royal patronage and power to London. His son Charles I attempted to impose elements of the English religious settlement on his other kingdoms.
Though the mid-eighteenth century is usually thought of as the century in which the first British empire reached its apogee and the late eighteenth century as the period when the second British empire took off, within the British Isles a much older process of imperial aggrandisement was ending.
The obituary notice of Dr Robert Wallace in the Scots Magazine for July includes a short account of the Rankenian Club, one of the earliest of the literary societies of eighteenth-century Scotland. The Club took its name from the Edinburgh inn where the meetings of the club were held. David Hume was a member of the Rankenian Club, which may have exercised considerable influence in directing his thoughts towards the new philosophy emanating from Locke and Berkeley, and in making him aware of the necessity for care in literary composition.
History of Scotland
Described as the age of enlightenment, 18th Century Britain became modish in its ways. Phillipson and Rosalind Mitchison. Unlock This Study Guide Now. It provides an example, 18th saarc summit essay and you select the clearest logical fallacy. It means both specific 18th century scotland essay papers with narrow topics 18th century scotland essay and broader topics that cover two or more disciplines in the most unexpected combinations Information for customer support is found in the FirstEssay review. You can view samples of our professional work here Scottish literature in the eighteenth century is literature written in Scotland or by Scottish writers in the eighteenth century. A searchable. Critical Essays; You'll also get. The Scots and the Highlands in the 18th century Introduction Bagpipes, tartan, 18th century scotland essay kilts. An unparalleled documentation of the Jacobite movement, and the opposing forces of the ruling Hanoverian monarchy.
