12 angry men free essays

The judge states in the opening scene that it is a premeditated murder in the 1st degree, if found guilty will automatically receive the death penalty. The prosecutors have several eye witness testimonies, and all of the evidence that they could need to convict the 18 year old male. In the movie it takes place on. Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not.

Essay/Term paper: 12 angry men

Free essays available online are good but they will not follow the guidelines of your particular writing assignment. If you need a custom term paper on Movie Reviews: 12 Angry Men , you can hire a professional writer here to write you a high quality authentic essay.

While free essays can be traced by Turnitin plagiarism detection program , our custom written essays will pass any plagiarism test. Our writing service will save you time and grade. The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father.

A jury of twelve men are locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair. The judge informs the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilty.

Even before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty. However, when the initial poll is taken Juror 8 Henry Fonda registers a shocking not guilty vote. Immediately the room is in uproar. The rest of the jury resents the inconvenient of his decision.

After questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror 8 Henry Fonda by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour. Eventually, as the talks proceed juror 8 slowly undermines their confidence by saying that the murder weapon is widely available to anyone, and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect. Gradually they are won over by his arguments and even the most narrow minded of his fellow jurors hesitantly agrees with him.

Their verdict is now a solid not guilty. Arriving at a unanimous not guilty verdict does not come easily. The jury encounters many difficulties in learning to communicate and deal with each other. What seems to be a decisive guilty verdict as deliberations begin slowly becomes a questionable not sure.

Although the movie deals with issues relating to the process of effective communication this paper will focus of two reasons why they encounter difficulties and how they overcome them. First, we will apply the Johari grid theory and see how it applies to their situation. Then, we will see how each individual"s frame of reference and prejudices effect their perception which cause difficulties in the communication process.

If we analyze the Johari grid of each juror we see a large hidden area in the case of all of the men. Take into consideration, referred to by juror numbers only they do not even have the benefit of knowing their names. These men have never talked before.

Each of them come from different situations with individual and unique experiences. The public area consists solely of the shared information provided during the trial. Their hidden area is immense resulting in an equally large blind area. The public, hidden and blind areas are relatively the same for each juror before beginning the deliberation. It is the size of the unconscious area that will differ more among the men.

We will see how the contents of the unconscious area will largely effect the decision making process of some of the jurors.

Because the information contained in the unconscious area is unrecognized it is often the most difficult to overcome. Henry Fonda"s Juror 8 interpersonal style would be classified as open-receptive. He levels with the others by openly admitting that he does not know if the boy killed his father and solicits feedback in order to make an accurate decision. He says "I just don"t think we should send a boy off to die without at least talking about it first.

The movie illustrates the process of leveling and soliciting feedback which can make all the difference. The character with the largest hidden window is the boy on trial. Realizing this, Henry Fonda Juror 8 tries to put himself in the boys shoes to gain a better understanding of his situation. He didn"t stand a chance in there. The important factor is his desire to comprehend the boys feelings. One man in particular, Juror 3 Lee J. Cobb has a sizable unconscious area.

He has a troubled relationship with his own son that preoccupies his thoughts. This is eluded to in a conversation between juror 7 Jack Warden and himself.

Looking at a picture of him and his son he says "haven"t" seen him in two years, kids, you work your heart out The broken relationship with his son preoccupies his thoughts as several times throughout the movie he is found staring at the picture. His interpersonal style would be classified as a blabbermouth. He is neither open or receptive.

He has his opinion and loves to share it. The net result is a large blind area. He is unwilling or unable to level with the others and is also unreceptive to any feedback. Most likely the extent of these feelings and the effect it has on his perceptions is unconscious to him. Eventually, he finds himself the only one maintaining a vote of guilty. He feels his sense of reality is in question and it threatens him. This puts him on the defensive. He bursts accusing the others of being crazy.

This emotional eruption changes from bitter anger to sad understanding. His defenses start to crumble as his unconscious emotions become visible to him. By recognizing his unconscious emotions essentially what he has done is level with himself. Once he did this he realized the anger and frustration with regards to his son has been misdirected toward the accused. With a new understanding of himself he is able to change his vote to not guilty.

Another issue dealt with in the movie is prejudice. Prejudice is defined as premature judgment or bias. In a trial situation Jurors are asked to only consider the evidence presented to them. Individual biases are not expected to effect the decision making process. Unfortunately, leaving our prejudices outside the court room door is near impossible. As the movie demonstrates prejudice can distort our views and greatly effects our ability to make accurate assessment"s.

Strong prejudice is displayed by Juror 10 Ed Begley as he bursts into a rage while referring to people from the ghetto, "Look you know these people lie, it"s born in them His guilty vote is cast as soon as he learns about the boys disadvantaged life in the slums. While most of the men are aware of the stigma attached to people from the ghetto they are willing to try to put the stereotype aside. His outburst has caused quite a disturbance in the room. This disturbance serves two purposes.

First, it provides the "not guilty" defenders with an understanding that his prejudice is the reason for his opposition. It is always easier to overcome an objection if you know what it is. Having this knowledge allows for a more productive communication there by convincing him that he should change his vote.

Secondly, it allows him to vent his frustrations. In doing so, he realizes the power of his emotions which forces him to step back and take a look at what he really feels. The look on his face shows he has a realization. For the first time he understands his prejudices have effected his perceptions.

This new understanding of himself enables him to think more clearly and objectively. It is interesting that the most damning evidence is the testimony provided by an eyewitness to the murder who is also a member of the boys slum community. Yet the boy, a product of the same community is an assumed liar. Henry Fonda Juror 8 points out the double standard to the others when he says "she"s on of them too?

Every man has the right to a fair trial, most would love the right to this jury. As the movie closes the not guilty verdict is handed down. It is not known if the boy is guilty or innocent, that will forever remain in his hidden area. Henry Fonda Juror 8 entered the trial with an open mind, he managed to convince the others to do the same. The movie illustrates that everything is not what it appears to be. Being aware of this is the first step to better understanding.

Need a different custom essay on Movie Reviews? Buy a custom essay on Movie Reviews. Need a custom research paper on Movie Reviews? Click here to buy a custom term paper. Many cultures use myths to teach their young about Tupac Two-pahk Amur Shakur, commonly known as 2pac, led a violent life. He died on September 13, Tupac was a big figure in the rap community, always English 11 5 December Trainspotting Trainspotting is a drop-dead look at a dead-end lifestyle.

Set among the junkies and thugs

Study for free with our range of university lectures! All Available Lectures. Study Resources. Free resources to assist you with your university studies! Dissertation​. Free Essays from Bartleby | INTRODUCTION: 12 Angry Men is a American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald.

The beginning stages of forming a group involve nurturing your group to avoid chaos. Functional groups will go through developmental stages while forming Gladding, A majority of the twelve men in the group are business men with careers such as architect, banker, and watchmaker. The men are all white men and seem to be America, except for one.

Teachers Pay Teachers is an online marketplace where teachers buy and sell original educational materials.

A man jury is sent to begin decisions on the first-degree murder trial of an year-old Latino accused of stabbing his father to death, where a guilty verdict means an automatic death sentence. The case appears to be open-and-shut: The defendant has a weak alibi; a knife he claimed to have lost is found at the murder scene; and several witnesses either heard screaming, saw the killing or the boy fleeing the scene. Eleven of the jurors immediately vote guilty; only Juror No.

12 Angry Men Essay

The film 12 Angry Men written by Reginald Rose depicts different human personalities attempting to decide the fate of a young man who is accused of killing his father. The jury must determine a verdict of not guilty or guilty, sending a young man to be executed for the crime of murder. However, eleven out of the twelve Jurors have it all figured out, Guilty they agree due to reasons that are illogical. Our writers will create an original "12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose" essay for you. However, Juror 8, the only Juror out of the twelve that took it upon himself to begin a discussion that would soon lead his fellow jury members to re-evaluate their positions by using personal prejudices, experience, evidence, swaying the Jurors to the moral decision.

12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. It's Free! Stop Using Plagiarized Content. Rose explores the incompatibility of irrational prejudice and how it impacts upon the fairness and reliability of the jury system. The prejudicial views of Juror 10 openly question the objectivity of the justice system by allowing his personal views to overshadow his judgement on the court matter. Rose uses Juror 10 to express his views on how the justice system is filled with flaws, as opinions are placed under facts. In addition, Rose underscores the fragility of justice that comes with complacency and those who are unfit for civic duty. Rose brings to light the indication of a jury system occupied with those who do not care about either the case or the wellbeing of the alleged. Furthermore Rose brings light to the notions of reasonable doubt and how it is a safeguard in the jury system. This notion is clearly the framework for the thought process of Juror 8.

Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, this trial film tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt, forcing the jurors to question their morals and values.

Order now. Anthropology Anthropology of Cities 9.

12 angry men Essay Examples

Free essays available online are good but they will not follow the guidelines of your particular writing assignment. If you need a custom term paper on Movie Reviews: 12 Angry Men , you can hire a professional writer here to write you a high quality authentic essay. While free essays can be traced by Turnitin plagiarism detection program , our custom written essays will pass any plagiarism test. Our writing service will save you time and grade. The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men are locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair. The judge informs the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilty. Even before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty. However, when the initial poll is taken Juror 8 Henry Fonda registers a shocking not guilty vote. Immediately the room is in uproar. The rest of the jury resents the inconvenient of his decision.

Twelve Angry Men

In your response discuss HOW the play position us to think about the jury system. Can anyone on the face of this planet admit with pride that humans are capable of being completely and utterly just? Can we openly announce that our legal system has sentenced the right people? Or has it resulted in executing innocent people who have been falsely accused?. Reginald Rose questions her confidence in the American legal system in her play Twelve Angry Men, who have the task of determining a sixteen-year-old boy's fate as an innocent or a murderer. It can be clearly illustrated how a variety of factors, such as one's personal prejudices, assumptions and desire to cut off a criminal from accessing society can obscure the truth. If the victim is white, the probability is 39 percent--over two times greater. Black offenders who rape and murder white victims in Virginia are over four times more likely to be sentenced to death than those who rape and murder black victims percent versus 15 percent.